Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Conker characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Conker (series). Drmies (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Conker characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is full of WP:FANCRUFT. Also, everything is unsourced. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep But add verified WP:Citation for each character. This would be in the scope of WP:VG as there are lists of other prominent game series such as List of Donkey Kong characters which have been adopted by the project. Gaming4JC (talk) 00:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - my keep votes for the Sly Cooper and Spyro character lists notwithstanding, I disagree that the Conker series is notable enough for WP:SPINOUT to be a valid argument. Especially considering that it consists of only two games and is based off Diddy Kong Racing, which itself isn't a well-known game Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 11:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, stronger merge similarly reasoned as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Spyro the Dragon, but less keepable as Satellizer points out that the Conker "series" is not really a series, with just one (NES) game and one (XBox) remake. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 12:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Conker (series). Given that CBF and L&R are effectively the same game, a two-game series really doesn't need a separate list of characters. After trimming fancruft, this easily can fit into the Conker (series) page. --MASEM (t) 14:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per Satellizer and Masem, to the series article. (Which is hardly warranted itself, but even if that ever got deleted/redirected, the content could then just be merged into the respective game articles...) Sergecross73 msg me 14:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.