Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Girgis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Coptic Soldier. (non-admin closure) sst✈^(conjugate) 08:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Luke Girgis

Luke Girgis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant promotion for non notable manager/executive. Lacks coverage about himself in independent reliable sources. Notability is not inherited from those he has managed.
This is one of two articles on this individual (other being Coptic Soldier). This was was created specifically to push their current projects, not as an encyclopedia article about the person.
Current borbardment of sources is:

1. About the band, not Girgis. Betrays a promotional intent in the Wikipedia article as Grigis is a co-manager.
2. Not an independent source. Says he has a dead guy as being part of his roster.
3. Primary
4. Him talking about himself, not independent covearge, does not verify claim in article.
5. Not a relible source. Does not really verify claim in article.
6. About Waters, not Girgis. No mention of Girgis. Does not verify claim in article.
7. About Waters, not Girgis. Only passing mention of Girgis. Does not verify claim in article.
8. Has section about Waters. No mention of Girgis. Does not verify claim in article.
9. Not an independent reliable source. Just his name in a list.
10. An interview of Little Sea, not about Grigis.
11. About Little Sea, no mention of Grigis. Does not verify claim in article.

This is promotion from a single purpose account. One of multiple accounts used to promoted around I Forget Sorry!
This should be deleted and not merged because it it spam and is very poorly sourced.. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• Redirect to Coptic Soldier. I agree with much of Duffbeerforme's commentary but I believe that a redirect would be sufficient – there may be wiki viewers that search for Luke Girgis rather than Coptic Soldier.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• Redirect as mentioned as this seems best regarding the current questionability. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.