Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magal Security Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magal Security Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Magal Security Systems: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Senstar Technologies: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

created 15 years ago. Not much of a page. Had a tag on it for almost 10 years MaskedSinger (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - none of those are rationales for deletion. What did your WP:BEFORE checks produce? St★lwart¹¹¹ 11:37, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of those references are from any reliable source. The references are from finance yahoo, PR news wire, and some magazines and blogs. None of those are acceptable as references and it does not meet WP:NCORP guidelines. Mommmyy (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article whose content and references fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. If there was coverage discussing this and other companies spun out of countries' military-industrial sectors, then the basic facts about this firm could find a place, but in the absence of that, I am not finding the necessary substantial coverage under the current or former names to demonstrate notability in its own right. AllyD (talk) 11:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.