Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majhraut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majhraut

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The source are either self published by caste people [1], it is translated as History of Yadavs by a person himself using the surname Yadav. There are other dubious sources too, which are basically Hindu mythological books Vishnu Purana, which even donot mention them, still used to expand the article. Other have minor references but the author has tried ,WP:SYNTH of sources to prove pseudo historical facts about the community. Hence it warrant a delition as it's nothing but junk written down by members of community to distort historical facts .

- This is [2] mythical. Vishnu Purana.
- A lot of Raj Era source are used which are not considered reliable for caste articles. [3] [4]
  [5]

Heba Aisha (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Heba Aisha (talk) 05:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~;Improvement I am improving the article and adding reference that is acceptable on wikipedia, all admins are requested to check. Kroshta (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)~~ Blocked for sockpuppetryHeba Aisha (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. –Cupper52^Discuss! 08:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing useful were found. Fails GNG. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 12:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 12:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked socks. Mz7 (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep : Rather than deleting it, I suggest it to be converted into a STUB article, as 'one of the many clans of Yadava community'. Kroshta (talk) 05:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : The article is under construction. MightyAbhira (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Striking comment from confirmed sockpuppet of Kroshta. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : The article is under construction. KrishnautYadavji (talk) 06:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Striking comment from suspected sockpuppet of Kroshta. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Its very unfair to ignore the tag that its placed under construction. Rather than deleting it, I suggest it to be converted into a STUB article, as 'one of the many clans of Yadava community'. GopatiSahab (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Striking comment from confirmed sockpuppet of Kroshta. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : I have checked the article, whatever issues had raised by Heba Aisha that has been solved. Majhraut is famous Yadav clan in Bihar & Jharkhand so i think that this page should not be deleted. UnitedYadava (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Striking comment from confirmed sockpuppet of Kroshta. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note GopatiSahab and UnitedYadava joined here 2 hours ago while MightyAbhira have only 8 edits. They all are suspected socks of Kroshta. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kroshta Regards. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 15:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, unless a suitable redirect can be found. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly Fails. Sonofstar (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.