Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Suwendy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. causa sui (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Suwendy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE as a journalist. a mere 4 gnews hits [1], and 2 of them passing mentions. note gnews includes major Malaysian newspapers. LibStar (talk) 02:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 03:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable and probably WP:PROMOTION. - DonCalo (talk) 19:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. No significant information except a lot of personal blogs and profile registrations all over the net. No valid source when she started her active years, list of all events associated with her or current projects she attends. Perfectford (talk) 09:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:GNG - She gets significant coverage in reliable sources[2] [3][4] Rednevog (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

only 1 of this is indepth coverage. it merely confirms her participation. LibStar (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Rednevog. WPSamson (talk) 03:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

only 1 source of what Rednevog provided is indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Appears to have two reliable sources. She appears to have hosted a popular show in the country she is from. She is a writer for a notable Malaysian newspaper. She was also mentioned here, in a Times of India article, a Malaysian Star article, another Malaysian Star article, a third Malaysian star article and a fourth Malaysian Star article. She was also mentioned in a Malaysia Current article. Not seeing any requirement in WP:NOTE that a person needs to be extensively covered as the sole focus of an article, and the totality of mentions across several sites appear to make her notable. I also suspect if I searched Malaysian language sites (I don't speak the language), I'd find more sources regarding her television and modeling work that would support notability. --LauraHale (talk) 11:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.