Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Charan Newton
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete (A7) by User:Geogre, non-admin closure A new name 2008 (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark Charan Newton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This appears to be a vanity article. There is no evidence that the author is notable. The article is not linked to from anywhere else on WP. The references are all to the blogs (mostly to the author's blog). Fashionslide (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a newly published author with no sources covering him. I found some press releases, and there is coverage in blogs, but that's all. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - A7, no claim to notability. "Published by Tor" is not a claim to notability - if my Google-fu is working, "Tor" is in fact this site, which seems to be only the slightest step up from an outright vanity press. Tagged as A7. Badger Drink (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Tor Books is a legitimate publisher of science fiction and fantasy and is a significant step up from a vanity publisher, not that this makes ths author notable. -- Whpq (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.