Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martín Canales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martín Canales

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the old WP:NFOOTY guidelines as doesn't appear to have played in a professional league. Doesn't meet WP:SPORTCRIT or WP:GNG — NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 23:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: ~~American football~~, New Zealand, and Chile. — NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 23:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: removed American Football sort category as it does not apply to this subject. Frank Anchor 16:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 01:11, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This is a dubious one. Santiago Morning is a professional team playing in the Chilean second league which is surprisingly or annoyingly named Primera B, suggesting it is better than it is. FWIW that is a professional league. I don't think he is a notable player though but passes barely our standards. --Bedivere (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, he does not. 'Our standards' are WP:GNG, it doesn't matter about the level of play. Giant Snowman 15:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Bdivere. @GiantSnowman:, I found [1], [2], [3], and [4] al of which go into his background, among many more sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First source looks OK, the rest less so. Not enough I don't think. Giant Snowman 15:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. GNG is not met. 1 is an interview in local news with little secondary content N. 2 is a trivial sentence prepending a quote from him N. 3 is from the same paper as #2 and contains a passing mention + quote N. 4 is another one-sentence passing mention N. JoelleJay (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aoidh (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article fails WP:GNG; online coverage is trivial/routine. Jogurney (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.