Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxair (aviation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 22:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maxair (aviation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unreferenced; especially not clear how big this company was and whether scheduled flights were operated. The little information I can find does not establish notability per WP:CORP: There just isn't anything substantial. --FoxyOrange (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Keep No signs of notability.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 18:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep operated at least one Saab 340, Metroliner and a Jetstream 31, and was notable enough to be allocated a iata code, just needs some references not deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Airlines are not intrinsically notable, regardless of the size of the aircraft operated; they must still meet WP:CORP. YSSYguy (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of references from Flight International's annual World Airline Directory for 2000 and 2001. These confirm that the airline did operate scheduled domestic and international services, and give an idea of the airlines fleet. [1] doesn't say much of any use, although it may do to premium subscribers. [2] indicates the airline launching a route between Malmo and Norrkoping, while [3] mentions the airlines bankruptcy. This is a Swedish article about the airline taking over the Malmo–Norrkoping route. I think that given these sources, Maxair probably passes GNG and so keep.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.