Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miodrag Koprivica
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete both. Michig (talk) 19:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Miodrag Koprivica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:47, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Marko Radoviċ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neither one of them never played in professional league. FkpCascais (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both - both articles is about footballers who hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented their country at senior level, which means that the articles fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.