Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Queen World
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was all speedy deleted by Jimfbleak. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Miss Queen World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- Miss Queen World 2010 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Miss Queen World 2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Miss Queen World 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of Miss Queen World editions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Miss Queen World Special Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of Miss Queen World titleholders (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
These articles were brought to my attention by WilliamJE (talk · contribs), who had identified them as a blatant hoax, and tagged them first for speedy ... and then when that was challenged by the creating editor, he PRODded them.
He then asked me for advice, and my response (see discussion on my talk, permalink) was that while they may be hoaxes, they are not blatant hoaxes.
I found some hits on a web search, though none on Google News, and nothing that looks like a reliable source.
On that basis, it seems to me that although "Miss Queen World" may not be a hoax, it is non-notable. As far as I can see, it fails WP:GNG by not having any significant coverage in reliable sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Little or no coverage from reliable sources as per BrownHairedGirl....William 14:11, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all of the associated pages per WP:NOTADIRECTORY. Qworty (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note. The first of these articles has been speedy-deleted by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs), who has also {{Spamblock}}ed the editor who created them all. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note The following are Confirmed as each other:
- Miss Beauty Internet Universe (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Miss Queen World (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
All articles created by the former should be considered for deletion as well. --MuZemike 06:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That is, this AfD and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Beauty Internet Universe are directly related to each other. --MuZemike 06:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.