Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohd Redzuan Nawi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mohd Redzuan Nawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article makes a claim of 2 appearances for Johor, which would give Redzuan Nawi presumed notability through WP:NFOOTBALL but there is no clear evidence of this anywhere. No such appearances recorded on Tribuna, GSA, Playmaker Stats and Soccerway, all of which have been tracking the Malaysian Super League since this player's career started.
A Malaysian search did not yield any clear significant coverage in WP:RS but plenty of small mentions on social media and Blogspot. Google searches tend to bring back the same results but with a few match report mentions like this in The Star, BH, BH, Goal and Goal. I would argue that none of this is WP:GNG coverage.
In conclusion, this footballer may or may not have 2 professional appearances (no indication of whether this was the entire match or just a few minutes at the end). In any case, I can't see GNG and there is a clear consensus that players with 1 or 2 appearances that do not pass GNG need to pass GNG, therefore, I would like to start a discussion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 11:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL, not enough Apps CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
*Keep Passes NFOOTY. He has 23 pro appearances in a FPL league, the Malaysian Premier Leaguehere. That's significantly more than a handful? Also found some local coverage where he scored a goal, although not sure if this counts here@GiantSnowman:Ortizesp (talk) 01:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ortizesp - the fully pro league is the Malaysia Super League, the top tier. The Malaysian Premier League is the 2nd tier and is not fully professional. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're right, striking my vote. Thanks for letting me know!@Spiderone:--Ortizesp (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- No problem :) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're right, striking my vote. Thanks for letting me know!@Spiderone:--Ortizesp (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ortizesp - the fully pro league is the Malaysia Super League, the top tier. The Malaysian Premier League is the 2nd tier and is not fully professional. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.