Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother Tongue Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Tongue Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This label does not seem to be notable enough for an article, please note that there is an Italian one of the same name which also seems to be non-notable. The Italian one seems to have slightly more sources available but both lack the depth of coverage from independent sources required to pass WP:NCORP or even WP:GNG. In addition, this label does not count as one of the more important indie labels so does not fit in with WP:NMUSIC; they've had a few artists that meet our notability standards but no indication that they were in any way a significant part of their history (in other words, the singles and albums released through this label were largely non-notable). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are no sources other than the organizations own website. This really needs to be a proposed deleteable thing with the only way to remove the proposed delete to find 1 source from a website not controlled by the subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.