Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musk v. OpenAI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to OpenAI#Controversies. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Musk v. OpenAI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No trial has been set yet; WP:NOTNEWS, maybe WP:TOOSOON. Broc (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. Broc (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nom. also WP:NOTNEWS. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 08:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to OpenAI#Controversies. 103.65.140.93 (talk) 10:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not Page Six for the AI industry. Nate • (chatter) 22:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. As indicated above it is already in OpenAI#Controversies. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like this put back to draft if possible. Thriley (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to mentioned article; a one paragraph long article on a section-like statement of a news story so it violates NOTNEWS; also agreeing that the lawsuit hasn't started, so TOOSOON applies too. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 15:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.