Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NTTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NTTV

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college tv network. Does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:BCAST. Won a regional Emmy, but that is NOT automatic notability. Rusf10 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Raymie (t • c) 08:38, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep produces a lot of original content that has won awards which is one of the criteria for articles about television statuons,imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I already addressed this, but I guess it must be repeated, regional emmys are not notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 23:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cable television channel that meets WP:BCAST, by being a regional cable television channel, and has won multiple regional Emmys. The Emmys alone might not be noteworthy, nor simply being a regional cable television channel, but combined together seems noteworthy. Smeggysmeg (talk) 19:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Combining two non-notable facts does not create notability. Not only doesn't it meet BCAST it doesn't even meet WP:GNG, there's no signifcant coverage in reliable sources. Most of the article is sourced to the tv station's website.--Rusf10 (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.