Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naqshbandia Mujadadia Aminia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as A10. (non-admin closure) samee converse 22:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naqshbandia Mujadadia Aminia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content is duplication of Naqshbandi. Any other unique material non-notable and unreferenced. Content has little to do with article title. AhmadLX (talk) 13:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree with nom's assessment, but am wondering whether it would be more appropriate to delete or redirect. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a separate article,it is sub lineage of Naqshbandi lineage,a book has been writen in urdu on this,here is the link i am sharing here,some expert in urdu language can read and confirm,the information given in this article are authentic,as it is sub chain of Naqshbandi so some similarity in names do exist but are not the same at all. https://www.thelibrarypk.com/tazkira-mashaikh-e-allo-mahar-sharif/}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Locozinho (talk • contribs) 20:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:29, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find enough evidence of RS coverage for notability. Eperoton (talk) 00:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No Need to Delete i find ths article quite useful as a branch of Naqshbandi islamic chain,I have personally visted this place Allo Mahar,where there is center of Naqsbandia Mujdadia Aminia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Do palmar (talk • contribs) 12:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How strange that right after registering you came straight to this page and comment "Keep" ;) And "useful" is no useful argument here ;) As above comment points out, notability established by reliable sources is required. AhmadLX (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.