Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega Red (rapper)
Appearance
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2023 February 24. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- O'Mega Red (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSINGER. Many of the sections are entirely unsourced. No significant coverage found. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 06:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above: the article currently fails WP:NSINGER and does not have enough significant coverage to justify itself. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment – I've just closed an RM to move it to a new title. This has no bearing on the AfD, of course, but I've edited some parts of the templatery to aid editors. Sceptre (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per above. 162 etc. (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando (talk) 13:59, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - He has gained some media coverage, mostly involving his charity work, such as [1]. The article currently has a citation to a Boston Globe article about him that was a healthy 1643 words but it is paywalled. So the situation is not as bad as most of the folks above have implied. But despite a long career and a few notices, the rapper hasn't gotten too far beyond his own hype. Also note that this article and its online copycats say he was mentioned in the The Source, but anything from that magazine itself cannot be found via a targeted search. And finally, I suspect that the pic at the top of the article is Photoshopped. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSINGER.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.