Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Mindfuck (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Illuminatus Trilogy. This is the redirect equivalent of a WP:SOFTDELETE. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Operation Mindfuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the claim that this is an important aspect of Discordianism, not much evidence has surfaced to support that. The entire two sentences of this article have already been merged verbatim to Discordianism and I don't see why that shouldn't be sufficient. In the deletion discussion 12 years ago, several people claimed they would add more to the article, but the small bits that were added have all been unsourced and were removed. Definitely seems to lack notability. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 9. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:09, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not at all sure how one would write much more about it. But given that the nom mentions that the same content exists in other articles, redirect would seem to be the correct course of action, to either the main discordianism article or to the Illuminatus Trilogy article. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.