Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasquale Di Nuzzo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pasquale Di Nuzzo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously PRODed and deleted as non notable actor. He still does not satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR and also fails WP:GNG as sources cited in the article are all YouTube and Instagram links which are not considered reliable. Moreover, Google search of him brings up blog sources, wedding announcement, and no in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources was found. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep When I search the web a lot of his sources are in Italian, but other then that He seems to meet WP:GNG notability by having significant news coverage. WEPrism222 (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC) WEPrism222 (talk)[reply]

@WEPrism222: Thanks for your participation. Could you please provide any three best sources that show he has in-depth significant coverage.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the references on the article are YouTube and blogs. The only thing that gets him close to meeting [[WP:NACTOR is the part in Soy Luna, but that alone is not enough. Jeepday (talk) 01:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 04:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 19:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.