Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perigreen
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Perigreen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The company does not meet the notability requirements. Could not find in-depth coverage in RS. Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:07, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 11:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.