Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Minack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Minack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Member of a band; questionable if any notability outside of that band. The reason I don't redirect to the band right away, is that he also released a book according to the article. Possibly 3 reviews in its time - a little thin as well? Geschichte (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Austlit (as mentioned above) list a review in the Australian Book Review, a review in the Advertiser and a biography in the Weekend Australian. The later is reproduced here. That's three good sources, enough for notability even without the band. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I concur with duffbeerforme. He is independently notable for the novel. I have added another reliable source, which provided a review.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with duffbeerforme and Shaidar cuebiyar. I have added another book review to the article (from The Australian). More could be added but the page certainly satisfies WP:NOT at this point. Cabrils (talk) 23:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. TISM are notable, book is notable. Doctorhawkes (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per Duffbeerforme - satisfies WP:ANYBIO. Dan arndt (talk) 09:43, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.