Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter X. Takahashi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 06:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter X. Takahashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I've nominated this page for deletion as the subject doesn't seem to be notable. A Google search gets less than 250 hits, and I can't find any reliable reference to receiving any significant recognised awards or honours. 203.173.16.199 (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC) Copied from talk page. ➔ REDVEЯS knows how Joan of Arc felt 13:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It looks as if this article was written as part of the Jimi's_Book_of_Japanese:_A_Motivating_Method_to_Learn_Japanese article. That article has undergone a slow series of reversions surrounding whether it is an advertisment. May want to evaluate both together, but I'm not sure. No !vote at this time. Xymmax (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Xymmax (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone can find evidence that claim of awards is true. Edward321 (talk) 05:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The only encyclopedia-worthy information in the article is "award-winning ... author." One-sentence article can be created again if someone has information about what awards he won, what he wrote, or anything else that makes him worthy of an encyclopedia article. Fg2 (talk) 10:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.