Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Andelman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Andelman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article had a deletion discussion 4 years ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Andelman, but with four new years worth of credits, this can't be viewed as a re-creation of the old article. I see Lips are Movin as the only one of his recent credits that actually was in anyway a milestone, due to its high online popularity. That said, I'm not sure that adds up to notability. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:25, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has undergone a rewrite. It now contains multiple references that address the subject directly and in detail, from reliable independent secondary sources as well as at least one primary source (interview). It now satisfies WP:GNG. Additionally, the subject's work (numerous music videos) has won significant critical attention, satisfying WP:FILMMAKER 4(c). ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 20:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (commune) @ 20:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Even though the article hugely relies on almost completely unrelated video sources, it contains sufficient info about his life and career that people will want to read about. MaRAno ^FAN 15:04, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.