Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Robert Anstruther

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philip Robert Anstruther

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and GNG and uses unreliable sources. Not Notable IMO Gbawden (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He appears in the London Gazette a few times which could back up claims of notability and statements in the article. I'm not familiar with referencing from that publication but will have a go later tonight if the creator hasn't added by then. JW 1961 Talk 16:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NSOLDIER. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 17:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom or redirect to Battle of Bronkhorstspruit. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no SIGCOV. The first sentence is a give-away. He did nothing notable. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claim to notability. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.