Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poonam Pandey (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2013 September 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BLP1E. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poonam Pandey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with grossly insufficient citations that fall well below WP:N Jsharpminor (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KeepThis model is a page 3 frequenter, and there might not have been much notability unless the amount of coverage she gets in entertainment pages of newspapers. Among the sources provided in the article, there are many reliable sources such as Times of India, India Today. Her claim to fame began when she promised a striptease if Indian cricket team wins 2011 Cricket World Cup, this was widely reported in media. Although India won, the promise never became true. However, she continued to grab attention of media for petty reasons. However small the reason may be, the result is wide coverage in media. There may be thousands like her, but she became the lucky one to get media attention. So, there is coverage, and she meets notability critia.--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete This person got coverage initially due to her fake/false claims about running nude and most coverage was about her subsequent tweets about teaching love-making tips and other similar stunts including self-made claims about working in the "hottest movie ever"(Nasha)....All these attempts got media coverage initially but seems to have died-down as no notable work either as an actor or as a model has been done by the subject and no further improvement of the article is possible--Adamstraw99 (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Adamstraw99. No significant coverage other than the twitter incident. JK (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable.Jussychoulex (talk) 17:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.