Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porsche Intermediate Shaft Bearing issue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Porsche 996. Consensus the issue doesn't warrant its own page.

I have merged in a couple of key lines, although if someone has specific changes they want to make, that's obviously also fine.

I've redirected post the merge since that seems to be what the participants wanted in aggregate. If any of the three disagree please let me know. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Porsche Intermediate Shaft Bearing issue

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure this belongs in a encyclopedia the information can likely be merged into the Porsche 996 article as we do not have articles on every possible automotive issue and most of the sources seem to be low quality sources 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly merge a couple of sentences (one briefly explaining the problem, another for the lawsuit). Even notorious issues with fatalities may not warrant standalone articles, e.g. the Ford Pinto's fuel tank problem. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Porsche 996. Seems like it warrants more of a mention there than there is currently, but probably not nearly as long as the article being discussed. A7V2 (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.