Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punch capacitor
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. merge and delete is not possible. If merged a redirect must be left behind. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Punch capacitor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough to warrant own article. Merge with capacitor. Jrtayloriv (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- So do that, then. This is Articles for deletion, not Articles for merging. AFD, and the deletion tool, form no part of the article merger process. Don't bring articles here if all that you want done is some exercise of the ordinary edit tool, which you yourself have. Uncle G (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural close AfD is not WP:PM. 65.93.15.213 (talk) 06:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not saying that AfD is WP:PM. I'm saying that the content from this article should be moved into capacitor and then this article should be deleted as a non-notable topic. -- Jrtayloriv (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not possible. WP:MAD . 65.93.15.213 (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Unless there is a particular reason to delete a redirect, admins should feel free to interpret 'Merge and delete' votes as 'Merge.'" Source: WP:MAD Guy Macon 22:03, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not possible. WP:MAD . 65.93.15.213 (talk) 07:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural Keep - The nominator is confused on policy, and is proposing a merger of content that precludes deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.