Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REM (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REM (magazine)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Previous AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/REM (Real Estate Magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Couldn't find any significant coverage of the magazine at all. An AfD closed as no consensus in 2009 but there was no actual evidence as to how this meets GNG/NCORP. Nothing has changed since then. C F A 💬 16:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Business, Companies, and Canada. C F A 💬 16:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, they've suspended publication [1].. This appears to be a trade publication, which generally can't be used for establishing notability; I can't find anything else about this publication in other media. It all hits on the American band of the same name. I wonder if Kenneth has found that frequency yet... Regardless, nothing for notability here. Oaktree b (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete zero evidence of, or even claim for, notability. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence this passes WP:GNG, WP:NCORP or any other SNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.