Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbi Yehoshua Fass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nefesh B'Nefesh. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rabbi Yehoshua Fass

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable except for connection with Nefesh B’Nefesh . Almost all the refs are about the organization. DGG ( talk ) 22:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 22:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 22:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect per meeting WP:SIGCOV. [1][2][3][4][5]. It's also plausible that additional sources exist in Hebrew language sources. TJMSmith (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If the article is kept, it should be moved to Yehoshua Fass (per WP:NCP), which is currently a redirect to his organization Nefesh B'Nefesh. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Of the five references offered above, three are all about the organisation, one is an interview that looks and read like PR and one is an apology, again regarding the business. Its seems what coverage there is, is about the business. I dont have confidence that Rabbi Yehoshua has independent existance outwiththe organisation. scope_creep^Talk 08:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ideal solution is a redirect. scope_creep^Talk 16:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a redirect is also appropriate. Edited my comment above to note this. TJMSmith (talk) 00:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't object to a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 23:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Nefesh B'Nefesh.4meter4 (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.