Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeshwer Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeshwer Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Challenging a removed PROD. Does not meet the definition of a notable politician(holds no public office and has not won election to one). Most of the sources here consist of party activities or Mr. Singh making political statements. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Proton Dental: Can you please tell me that Neeraj Kundan has also not won any election then why his article is there in this encyclopedia? Pokaiᗙ Happy New Year!
  • Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being vice-presidents of political party youth wings, and the referencing consists of a mix of primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, glancing namechecks of his existence in sources that aren't about him, and sourcing where he's the person doing the speaking rather than the person being spoken about — none of which are support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I believe that as he is the Vice President of a prominent political party so his article should be there in this encyclopedia or at least redirect to Jammu & Kashmir National Conference but must not be deleted. Pokaiᗙ Happy New Year!
Pokai This person is not the "Vice President of a prominent political party", they are the Vice President of the youth wing of a political party. Even setting that aside, "Vice President of a prominent political party" is not part of the notability criteria for politicians, meaning he would need to be shown to meet the broader definition of a notable person. The article does not do that at present, as the only claim to notability is "he usually raises issues of common people", without describing any influence or significance in doing so. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.