Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasmus Rinne
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Rasmus Rinne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Non-notable amateur ice hockey player who does not pass the notability guidelines established in WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Prod was contested on the basis of Rinne having played in 3 SM-liiga games in 2008–09. However, he did not play in these games, only dressed in them as per this source. Further, this source and this source further identify that he has never played in an SM-liiga game, and therefore fails the criteria of having played in a fully professional game in a top league. – Nurmsook! talk... 06:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —– Nurmsook! talk... 06:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —– Nurmsook! talk... 06:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nurmsook. --Nlu (talk) 06:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, only dressed but did not play. Per past precedence for sports figures, you have to actually play to qualify. -DJSasso (talk) 12:43, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; doesn't meet WP:NHOCKEY since he hasn't played in a professional league yet. HeyMid (contribs) 13:05, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it doesn't mee WP:NHOCKEY notability requirements. GoodDay (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.