Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Smith (footballer)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 20:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rob Smith (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Telfordbuck (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Any chance of providing a rationale for deletion? --Michig (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll add a rationale. Fails WP:Athlete having never played or managed in a fully professional league. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 22:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Apologies, admittedly, i forgot, it wont happen again Telfordbuck (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - article is about a footballer who hasn't played or managed a team in a fully pro league, which means that the articles fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.