Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Bolton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert H. Bolton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable banker who fails GNG. Sources are a smalltown obituary and a New Orleans news article that mentions his family but not the subject. Page creator banned from WP for persistent copyright violations. ミラP 03:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ミラP 03:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ミラP 03:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ミラP 03:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ミラP 03:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Like most Hathorn articles, the sourcing does not suggest that he is anything more than a local businessman active in his community. I don't really think any of the Bolton family members he created articles on pass notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I did some poking around, but the only claim to notability, that he was the president of the Louisiana State Bankers Association and the fourth in his family to be such, is pretty small potatoes. Meanwhile, clicking the links for the other relatives makes me doubt the accuracy of the article, because some of the relationships seem to be confused and we have no reliable sources with which to correct them.Jahaza (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.