Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Pickett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to White House intruders. clear and obvious consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert W. Pickett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A classic example of WP:BIO1E. He is already listed with a citation at White House intruders and does not reach the notability standard to justify a separate article. St Anselm (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination Changing suggestion to redirect to White House intruders. My76 Strat 02:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not news, BLP1E, etc etc... no way this guy is going to be notable in the near future unless he manages to actually shoot someone. Hairhorn (talk) 03:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: didn't realize he was already listed when I recommended a merge. Redirect per below.AerobicFox (talk) 05:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to White House intruders. Remotely plausible search term, plus redirects are cheap. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to White House intruders. Not enough for a stand-alone article, and, as mentioned above, the subject's name is a plausible search term. Location (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.