Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodger Azadganian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rodger Azadganian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Intended or not, this looks more like a personal page and my searches found nothing to suggest improvement with the best results here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 03:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -Article does have some secondary sources listed, but reads like an ad. ABF99 (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - no indication of importance plus it's a clear advertisement. —Мандичка^YO 😜 19:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Fails WP:Bio completely. Looks like a slight promo article too. The Undead Never Die (talk) 04:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is not eligible for speedy deletion as per the sources and its very loose attempt at asserting notability. Upon a further WP:BEFORE look it doesn't appear this individual meets WP:ANYBIO or WP:SIGCOV. Mkdw ^talk 00:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.