Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safwat riad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Safwat riad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and non-notable . The references are either mere mentions or interviews where he says what he pleases, or are almost entirely about other people. DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 01:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. We don't need this kind of fluff on Wikipedia. Oaktree b (talk) 02:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional piece for a non-notable person. Mccapra (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - purely promotional piece. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable, independent sources. Promotional. It does not meet WP:GNG --Kemalcan (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.