Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saqi Books
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Saqi Books (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable business. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:51, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing present reads above the level of a press release coverage. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO. Strictly an advertorial page; it even includes the address of the company: "The Saqi Bookshop is located in central London on 26 Westbourne Grove." K.e.coffman (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.