Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarselli diamonds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scarselli diamonds

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability here is very minor, and limited essentially to a) they have occasionally sold very large diamonds, and b) they were interviewed by CBS news for a fluff piece: "wow, that's a big diamond".

The article in its initial state was nauseatingly promotional. Once the advertising speak was cut out, what is left is really not much beyond a company listing. Does not meet WP:GNG. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to find any significant coverage about the company. There are a few mentions, mostly trivial. The article itself is too promotional. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:58, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I also found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 00:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.