Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/School of thought

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 10:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

School of thought

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, non-notable phrase. Jax 0677 (talk) 18:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A well known concept. Some book references: [1],[2] (page 9, etc.), [3] (schools of architectural thought), [4]. That's why this page exist on other languages. In Russsian ru:Школа_(в_науке_и_искусстве) it has a similar, but a little wider meaning. My very best wishes (talk) 18:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - unsourced is a surmountable problem. Notable - well known, and colloquial. Lightburst (talk) 22:15, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - the nomination fails to advance a coherent argument for deletion and is really just a WP:VAGUEWAVE (criteria no. 1); mostly because whatever issues it plausibly identifies were trivially fixed - so trivially fixed, it indicates the nominator didn't bother to do even a very basic WP:BEFORE. There are plenty of valid sources about "schools of thought" in all kinds of disciplines; ex. history; economics (has it's own WP page, ffs); philosophy; ... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, odd nom to be frank. Hyperbolick (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.