Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharif Majzub
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 03:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sharif Majzub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This biographical article cites only one source, [1], but that source does not actually mention this person. Nor is there any indication here of what era the person lived in. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
^ http://books.google.com/books?id=fEs9AAAAMAAJ ^ [The Islamic path: sufism, society, and politics in India, Saiyid Zaheer Husain Jafri, Helmut Reifeld - 2006 ] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.159.213 (talk) 18:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. I've found nothing in Arabic and Persian.Farhikht (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.