Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Ann Grau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti*poke* 15:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shirley Ann Grau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP remains unsourced after 11 months. BlackCab (talk) 09:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found references very easily, which I have added to the article. Very notable (e.g. pulitzer prize) and now has some references. Davewild (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Pulitzer prize Jonathanwallace (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; significant coverage in reliable sources + Pulitzer prize winner.--BelovedFreak 14:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 14:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep clearly passes WP:BIO as a result of the coverage and Pulitzer. Hut 8.5 16:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Pulitzer win makes her clearly notable and she's in several other Wikis.--T. Anthony (talk) 12:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.