Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smartworks
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Smartworks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphaned since 2006, unedited since 2007, one-line unsourced stub with no claims for notability. Only edit by the initial author. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 04:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - Amongst all the press releases, I did find [1], [2], and [3]. If an article on the company Standard Register existed, a merge there would probably be appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Get rid of this orphaned one-line stub. If this company ever gets notable, the article can always be re-created SPLETTE :] How's my driving? 20:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A a web-based interface from a business we don't have an article about. If that business is notable, we may some day have an article about it that could mention this. If not, we don't need an article on this product. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.