Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic exe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sonic exe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find video game sources: "Sonic exe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)
A completely unorganized set of ideas that is basically original research. Unencyclopedic. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 17:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR. -- Jelly Soup (talk) 12:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unencyclopedic article lacking reliable sources, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I found two refs from reliable sources (GamesRadar and GameInformer), but they aren't detailed enough to establish notability. Even including these two, there isn't enough information available to create an encyclopedic article without resorting to original research: doesn't pass GNG. czar · · 00:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not establish notability, original research.Jucchan (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - obvious original research/original thought. Stalwart111 00:17, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.