Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaminarayan Gadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The first part of the debate discussed this version of the article. Subsequently, the article was reverted back to being a disambiguation page, which the second part of the debate discussed. The delete !votes centered around the incoherence of the original article, the keep !votes centered around the fact that a coherent disambiguation page once existed, and one redirect !vote disagreed with the usefulness of the disambiguation page. Three separate arguments, but little substantive discussion for each. Thus, I see no viable outcome other than "no consensus." (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 04:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swaminarayan Gadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure of this article's purpose. And its talk page is tagged with WikiProject Disambiguation? I don't think this page benefits Wikipedia. --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The page appears to be talking about a religious prophet, which religion this person is related to, I do not know. Seasider91 (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After doing a little research it appears this page is a duplicate of Swaminarayan. I highly doubt a redirect would be beneficial in this case, or maybe it could? Seasider91 (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Revert It seems there was a somewhat useful disambig at one point. It is possible the faction could meet notability for an article but this is not that article. Page may need protection Yasth (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and trout Reverted back to normal disambig. Page has been vandalised severely. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 18:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 18:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Yasth and DatGuy. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Swaminarayan Sampraday#Breakaway groups and disputes. Not a useful dab, neither linked article contains a mention of 'Swaminarayan Gadi'. The link in the intro, repeated to or three times below that, is the link to the only article which mentions this term, and readers should be directed straight there. Boleyn (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 17:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.