Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TH Baker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TH Baker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no clear evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Of the given references, one is local coverage written in terms that "a family-owned Black Country jewellery chain is still thriving", the second is a "hot 100" recognition in an annual industry award, and the third concerns another firm who did work for them. These indicate a firm going about its business, but neither these not my searches are providing evidence that it has attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I myself planned to nominate sooner but was reluctant because I considered PROD which has vulnerability of being removed ; overall there's nothing at all minimally convincing here. SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.