Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tab Two

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KTC (talk) 10:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tab Two

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band. Natg 19 (talk) 00:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me with their discography, and one of the members at least having a Wikipedia page, that this band does meet some notability requirements. I say let the article stay up. Though there could be more verifiable sources, they do have a couple that back up their notability, and they've clearly released a great deal of material and toured and received recognition in doing so. WeAreAllStars (talk) 9:11, 16 January 2015 (EST)

Weak Keep I'm seeing three articles from two different sources in which the topic is Tab Two. While I can't speak for the notability of the two sources, the fact is that the citations have multiple (3) secondary sources involving non-trivial coverage. So it passes WP:N -Markeer 02:58, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The albums released on Virgin, Polydor, and EMI easily pass one criterion of WP:NMUSIC. There's plenty of coverage in German sources, e.g. [1], plus several articles in publications such as Billboard, e.g. [2], [3], and [4]. --Michig (talk) 10:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coverage from multiple reliable sources in article and provided above, meets WP:GNG. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.