Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tank Thong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tank Thong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see this as notable enough for an article D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and tear into bits and pieces. No notability and completely inappropriately written. --Nlu (talk) 06:53, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What everyone else in the world calls a bodysuit or leotard, just with alot less material. Non-notable on its own in every way. Nate • (chatter) 08:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is that what it is? Seriously, I had no frickin' idea. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to bodysuit. There seem to be enough products sold under this name (going back at least to 1993, to my surprise) that it would be a plausible search term. I'd suggest a merge/redirect to a subsection on the variant, if anyone could find a reliable source that mentions it instead of just advertisements. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.