Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teruko Kiriake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ due to a lack of participation. No prejudice against immediate re-nomination. Daniel (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teruko Kiriake

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unbundled nomination from prior AfD. WP:BEFORE shows only Japanese language sources with nominal statistics-type coverage of the competitor e.g. [1] and [2]. As a commentor at the bundled AfD stated, standard athlete blurb...stats page with no secondary coverage...local-interest community news story and so forth do not demonstrate notability; WP:NATHLETE requires additional, NOTNEWS coverage, or medals at major event, which does not pertain here. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Olympics, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per my argument at the bundled AfD.

JoelleJay (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the bundled nom was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Jahn ☆ Bri (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nishonippon.com seems to have several stories focusing on her, but they're behind paywall: see (translated) "Kurume City presents Sports Achievement Award to Olympic female canoeist Kiriaki" and "Canoeist Kiriaki reports on his 7th place finish in the World Cup and visits his hometown of Yame City", which each look like they have a decent chance at being sigcov. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.