Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reasoning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Reasoning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence of notability of this band. The article contains no independent sources, despite being tagged since September 2010, and searches have failed to produce any independent sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Coverage found was unconvincing but putting it here in case others disagree: Music in Belgium: [1], [2], [3], Midlands Rocks. Nothing else found.--Michig (talk) 07:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is scantly sourced, and there is not a proof of notability. They do have ties with notable artists and bands, although none of the listed artists in the infobox have their own wikipedia articles. The label, Coment Music, is also not on wikipedia, which they have released three albums through. To be honest, I don't like voting delete for this page; that probably has partly to do with the fact that I like this band. Adding some more sources to this page would make me possibly consider having this page kept. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 07:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the bass player and founder member of the band The Reasoning. I see our page is up for deletion. Not quite sure how this process works but I have to say that all the information here is correct. It could be worded better and I will endeavour to do that, but everything stated is true. I have no idea where the guys disputing this got their information from. Anyway,if anyone wants to contact me about this matter, please forward all correspondence to [email protected].

Thank you.

Matthew Cohen The Reasoning — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattBass6 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody has suggested that the information is not "correct". The article has been nominated for deletion because there seems to be no evidence that the band is notable, not because teh information given is thought to be inaccurate. Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (music) will give you an indication what is required to demonstrate notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.