Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatre of Pakistan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Just needs some cutting down. No need to delete a perfectly good topic. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 06:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Theatre of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite attempts to clean this up, this article remains an unverifiable mess. No RS, no cohesion, PROD declined, August 2010, no improvement since then. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 03:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Jezhotwells (talk) 03:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think the messy stuff should be deleted, but that still shouldn't be reason to delete the entire article. We can cut it down and leave it as a stub, the topic is worthy of being kept. Mar4d (talk) 07:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The nominator has identified issues with the currect article content, which can be fixed by editing, rather than any reason why we should not have an article on this subject. If you want sources you could start with the chapters on the topic in The Cambridge guide to Asian theatre (ISBN 9780521588225) and The World Encyclopedia of Contemporary Theatre (ISBN 9780415059336). Phil Bridger (talk) 14:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.