Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobuscus Adventures: Wizards!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tobuscus Adventures: Wizards!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable game, almost all sources are primary (e.g. Youtube videos, Indiegogo pages trying to raise money, or press releases). Jinkinson talk to me 13:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 17:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Youtube videos and press releases do not represent significant coverage in independent reliable sources. My own search found an abundance of these types of links but not coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Audience, what? what!? What are you doing starting an AfD about Tobuscus Adventures? Intro of darkness then redness then whiteness! Seriously though. Meets the criteria one would expect from a notable YouTubers game. 97.123.7.170 (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And what WP-policy-based criteria would that be?Dialectric (talk) 12:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - or redirect to Toby Turner; a planned video game that has not been released typically should not have an article WP:CRYSTAL. All of the sourcing covers the developer and his fundraising campaign, and there is no indication the game is notable independent of the developer.Dialectric (talk) 12:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom and Whpq. -- ferret (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.